Nazi ideology alive and well in the EU
Why is the EU and UN so desperate to force Israel to give up the land they captured prior to the 1949 Armistice Agreements? Why do they shy away from supporting Israels right to self defense? Complicated questions certainly: obscured in personal and political reasoning. The truth of the matter is that there are many moving parts to this puzzle one certainly being a seething hate for the Jew.
EU Foreign Policy Chief Catherin Ashton, recently visited Gaza and reiterated the view that “East Jerusalem is occupied territory, together with the West Bank.” Her support for the Palestinian cause is not difficult to spot, nor her disdain for the Jewish state. Shortly after Ashton arrived in Gaza, a rocket fired by Palestinians killed a Thai farm worker within the Israeli border. Ashton’s comment was not a condemnation of those Palestinians responsible, but instead a well crafted politically generic statement “I condemn any kind of violence” that would insure no perceived support for the Zionist. This callous comment represents, as a whole, the European Unions outwardly expressed public policy toward the Israeli Palestinian conflict.
To solidify this anti Jewish message UN Chief Ban Ki-moon arrived just a few days later to tour both the West Bank and Gaza and again demand that all occupied land be handed over to the Palestinians and that Hamas be given full access to Egypt. No mention of the violence that may ensue from this action, instead Palestinian violence has been all together ignored. Both visits seemed to have been well coordinated and focused upon placing heavy pressure upon the evil actions of the Zionist State under the control of Benjamin
Netanyahu who dared defy Europe’s elite.
Interesting enough, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at the annual policy conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee said that
“New construction in East Jerusalem or the West Bank undermines mutual trust and endangers the proximity talks that are the first step toward the full negotiations that both sides want and need.”
Hypocrisy has never been so deep. The Arab nations and their allies the Palestinian land owners forfeited the West bank and East Jerusalem when they decided to destroy Israel and then failed. Every county demanding that Israel not build on occupied lands have, to their own territory, lands taken from conquest: usually as the aggressor not the defender. Therefore, in all rights, these disputed lands belong to Israel.
So, why is Israel always being targeted as the aggressor? The truth is simple, God blesses them and because of this they draw attention to themselves. Atheists, certainly will disagree with this, so lets just say that the Jewish people have a propensity to uncommon success. Granted, on occasion, they over react to a terrorist 
event or two and create their own bad press.
I dare say that few of those who condemn Israel really can understand their own reasoning for anger. It seems to be out of a shared psychotic disorder that this anger arises where a small minority influences the collectives beliefs. This is easily evidenced by studying the rise and fall of the Nazi state. The sad conclusion here is that Nazism was not extinguished with Hitlers death, but is alive and well within Europe today. Europe’s leadership would fiercely Deny this claim, by playing down their own unbalanced and biased treatment of Israel while at the same time desensitizing their own people again to blatant Jew hating.
Netanyahu certainly has a fight on his hands, and his only defence is to remain firm and resolved in the face of a perceived overwhelming set of odds. Recently his brother-in-law made a seemingly tack-less accusation that Barack Obama was antisemitic and hatted Israel, Netanyahu distanced himself from the comment. Sometimes political tack needs to be surrendered in order to expose the truth.
President Obama and his Secretary of State often note how strong ties are with Israel, but in a well let room it is easily observed that those strong ties were not built upon the Democratic Party, but by the people who now reject Obama. It would be in Israel’s best interest to take advice from established friends and not those who now seek to diminish the State of Israel. Israel’s right to exist is directly tied into its right to defend, grow and act as a sovereign state without molestation from its neighbors or any world power. Israel’s only hope to survive is to rule its land in its best interest, by embracing their right to say NO!
Shortlink:
12 Responses to Nazi ideology alive and well in the EU
Leave a Response
Translator
You’re argument that implies that anyone who is critical of the actions of Israeli is an anti-semite who supports Nazism is despicable. It is nothing more than a low-blow designed to stifle any constructive debate over the issue.
I do not deny Israel’s right to exist and defend itself. However, to suggest that criticism of Israeli’s actions, which at times are unjustified, is motivated by a hatred of Jews is out of line. We should condemn any attacks on innocent Palestinians just as we should condemn any attacks on innocent Israeli’s, both sides are guilty in this conflict. Both sides must be willing to acknowledge that fact if peace is to be obtained.
I won’t argue that there is a sense of hypocrisy in regards to Western nations criticizing Israel for expanding it’s terrority. Consider however, the fact that these actions may not be in Israel’s best interest as it only creates anomosity towards the state from Arabs within the region.
I was not aiming at implying that everyone critical of Israel was hateful, but that there remains a spirit of Nazism still alive and well in the World. I noted that Israel often errors with heavy handed tactics, which is critical in itself. Therefore, I can not see how you arrived at your conclusion. My goal with the article was to bluntly expose the parrell that now exist between Germany’s Nazi Party and the hate for the Jew now pouring out of the UN, EU, Obama Administration and others around the world.
Could you tell me where is the proof of the Nazi ideology you mention?
I am afraid your going to have to do your own Google search -it is fairly simple I hear
The quotes you have provided show no evidence of an anti-Jewish Nazi ideology.
Let’s take the defintion of anti-semitism as given by Holocaus scholar Helen Fein:
“A persisting latent structure of hostile beliefs towards Jews as a collective manifested in individuals as attitudes, and in culture as myth, ideology, folklore and imagery, and in actions – social or legal discrimination, political mobilization against the Jews, and collective or state violence – which results in and/or is designed to distance, displace, or destroy Jews as Jews.”
Professor Dietz Bering of the University of Cologne further expanded on Professor Fein’s definition by describing the structure of antisemitic beliefs. To antisemites, “Jews are not only partially but totally bad by nature, that is, their bad traits are incorrigible. Because of this bad nature: (1) Jews have to be seen not as individuals but as a collective. (2) Jews remain essentially alien in the surrounding societies. (3) Jews bring disaster on their ‘host societies’ or on the whole world, they are doing it secretly, therefore the antisemites feel obliged to unmask the conspiratorial, bad Jewish character.”"
I see no evidence that criticisms of Israeli policies are an attack on the Jewish people as a whole.
Ok, so you did note some criticisms of Israel. However, criticisms of Israel’s heavy-handed tactics are no more extreme than criticisms coming out of the organizations that you have excused of hating Jews. Why is it then that your criticisms of Israel are considered legitmate while others are linked to Nazism?
Well, you likely hate the Jew and this is why you can not see the bias coming out of the UN and EU. Your inability to recognize that the land currently occupied is not occupied, but taken as a prize which is not uncommon for man. The majority of nations including the one you live in likely has land that is has taken by either defense or conquest. Therefore, to continue to say to the Jew that those lands taken are occupied is nothing but bias and hate. If you want to continue debating – let’s stick to this one topic – one topic at a time.
I will likely not respond again today – not feeling too well: I have a miserable cold
You’re accusation that I hate the Jew is a bold one. It is simply not true. If hated the Jew I would be in support of organizations like Hamas who commit unacceptable acts of violence against the people of Israel.
I am Canadian. A friend of mine once described Canada as “an illegitmate settler’s state”. As the land was stolen from the natives (of which he is one). I’m inclined to agree. The Europeans came over here and committed atrocites against the native population. However, he displays no hatred towards Canadians of European descent such as myself. I believe that the solution to this conflict between Canada’s native population and it’s European descedants is to learn to share the land we are living on. This is in essence the argument for a two-state solution. I do not see how advocating a two-state solution would make me a Jew hater. Take that the other way. Are we then to assume that those who are critical of the Palestinians are all Arab haters? No.
Continuing on this issue of one people occupying another, many people will argue that America is occupying Iraq. We would not accuse those who criticize America for this as hating someone by the virtue that they are American.
I hope that is sticking to one topic.
Your friend is likely much to far down the historic time line to feel the sting of a love one being killed or land being taken. The Indian issue is, I believe, the wrong example here, but certainly a great topic for an article.
The two state solution is fine, but I don’t believe that it should come out of the West Bank or East Jerusalem unless Israel out of their own heart wanted to donate some land. Instead I believe it should come out of Egypt, or Jordon. If I am not mistaken well over half of the Israeli population feels a Palestinian state is fine. However, for the Palestinian they want their old lands back: I don’t blame them. Yet when the Arab nations were pouring done upon Israel to crush them the Palestinians did not stay and defend their lands or support Israel they instead with glee were hoping that Israel would be destroyed and that when they returned Israel would be destroyed. Remember there is always a simple truth – the truth here is that the Palestinians of today had parents who bet on the wrong side. If they would have instead said “We will stick with our neighbors and fight” we would have today one of the greatest economic regions in the world.
Since Iraq and Afghanistan are sovereign nations and both choose to continue American involvement, I will not address your other example.
Well, you bounced a bit LOL
Just some I’m clear then. What you are suggesting is that a two state solution is brokeed by Egypt or Jordan?
You are correct on the feelings of the Israeli population. The BBC has an interesting article that takes opinions from various Israelis regarding the recent row between the U.S. and Israel. (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8585239.stm)
Ugh, forgive the typos in that last post.
I’d also argue against the idea that all Iraqis and Afghans support American involvement though that is likely getting off-topic.
Ashton is a Mentally Challenged person and has no business being head of anything but a cleaning detail, maybe. Seems like the EU is made up of such sick, money hungry idiots and some of the laws they come up with are so idiotic it is pathetic! Most could never find a job in the private sector because of their mental instability. The best thing for the EU is for a terrorist to just blow the whole building up with all the ministers in it. If that happened, would the person be considered a terrorist? I think not to many people of the EU, he would be more of a hero!