Obama’s policy of confused leadership

America’s economy is a guessing game,  unemployment is still completely, for the most part, unaddressed, international influence is waining and America’s really are not sure what to expect from their President: regardless of party affiliation.

After the Presidents State of The Union address, many Americans just slumped back into their chair and sighed: clutching their check books close.

Many in the international community, especially in the west, seem to be in a guarded awe that the new President of the United States, the leader of the free world, is not leading.

It is, as if, the United States has been destroyed, and a vacuum of power has suddenly been forced upon them.

Questions are everywhere, everyone has their opinion, is this haphazard leadership,  inexperience, poor policy or possibly an alien invasion: what is going on in the White House?

Russia seems to have sensed this weakness, and has been positioning themselves to scoop up regional influence in various  international locations almost, as if on cue.   Putin’s desire to regain what respect Russian may have lost under President Ronald Reagan is working this situation to his favor.

The Administrations response is akin to being 21 points down, on the 50; with 10 seconds and in the fourth quarter: always on the defensive and always chasing a lost initiative.

Americans are plainly disgusted with the lack of performance from their President.

Many in Israel seem to feel the same way, and its people really don’t know what to do with President Obama, first he says he  is for them and then he pressures them to give up necessary defensive lands.

Now China is worried about Obama’s  ability to keep his word,  apparently on his visit last November to China he vowed that the United States would respect China’s interests.  It would be inappropriate to call our national leader an bumbling idiot, so I shall not.  However, what was he thinking?

Maybe those who elected him will finally realize why the Republican Party made it a point to remind them,  that candidate Obama was to inexperienced to a be President.

StumpDog7

About the author

Phil Kammer wrote 194 articles on this blog.

Phil Kammer is just a simple guy who happens to write a bit; enjoys political truth; loves to shine the light into dark places and watch the liberals scatter, but most of all Phil loves God and works daily to become the servant he needs to be. And ya Phil has a few degrees, was army infantry, now a father, a fisherman and loves a great game of monopoly.

Share This Post

Shortlink:

One Response to Obama’s policy of confused leadership

  1. First it isn’t incompetence, but rather, I believe his method of leadership or seemingly, lack thereof, is a contrived plan to destroy and remake America into a frenchy french weaponless, non confrontational, utopia.

    Second, the republican party reminded them my butt. John McSwine was the so called leader of the Republican party at the time and he did very little to remind anyone of anything except why he shouldn’t have been the nominee.

    Republican party. No different than the Democratic party save the spelling of the name.

    Art Wayland/912 Truck

Leave a Response

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes