Global Warming Dying A Horrible Death

Hear comes the boogieman, ready to sweep those who proclaimed global warming horrors and world cataclysms off into scientific  obscurity.

The question that remains, is who put these scientist up to this heist and who worked so frantically  to extort the worlds wealthiest nations: who has yet to be revealed?

Who falsified documents; who will try and deny their roll in frightening the world into potentially paying billions in global warming taxes.

Obviously, Al Gore needs to be fully investigated for his frighten theatrics and lying to the worlds population for personal gain.

With over 30,000 American Scientist demanding additional evidence into global warming no excuse will be sufficient.

Currently the calls for  Rajendra Pachauri to resign as Chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPPC) are heating up because of his shabby scientific reporting of  global warming science.  A false science  used to beat down the truth and frighten billions of humans into submission.

Any investigations into the falsehoods of global warming need not be only investigated by one nation or the UN, but rather a joint commission with punishments ready to be handed out.

Vaclav Klaus, the President of the Czech Republic would be an excellent choice to head such a massive endeavor.  President Klaus was one of the few world leaders who demanded better evidence into global warming and was met  by ridicule and insults by UN scientists and other pro global warming promoters.

Many of the worlds monarchies need to be unapologetically investigated, as well, for their roll.  The President of the United States Barack Obama and his Administration along with other European leaders need to be considered as well as they pushed this false agenda onto the people.

The people of the world need honest representation when it comes to global warming.  Those who promoted global warming upon the world need not apply to any investigating body.

The truth needs to be uncovered and those who are guilty punished.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • MSN Reporter
  • RSS
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
Share This Post
Posted by Phil Kammer on Jan 25th, 2010 and filed under BREAKING NEWS, European Events, Our Planet, Washington In Perspective. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response by filling following comment form or trackback to this entry from your site

13 Responses for “Global Warming Dying A Horrible Death”

  1. Arabia Jackson says:

    How do we know this is true? If it is true then why isn’t our government trying to do something about it!! I mean I know the government can’t physically just stop it but we can try to prevent GLOBAL WARMING from happening!! The GOVERNMENT IS JUST TO GREEDY THESE DAYS!! THEY ARE THINKING ABOUT THEMSELVES AND NOT THEIR GRANDCHIDREN AT ALL>

  2. Phil Kammer Phil Kammer says:

    Well, listen to your comment, your asking why we can’t prevent Global Warming when the science actually says it is likely a none issue. Your concern may very well come from, a very well played game of propaganda, played by many known and unknown world figures. Keep your mind open to both sides of the issue and just watch how world leaders now scramble to find cover. I believe that what you will find when all the dust settles is that man can slightly affect his environment, but no where to the levels of requiring a world tax. This needs to be investigated primarily because people have made money from this scam.

  3. Andy says:

    Al Gore is the profiteer behind this scam. He has made tens of millions off of it, won Nobel prize, Oscars and everything else. Fraud at the highest level. Profiteering off of every country in the world. Sickening. Embarrassing. Shocking.

  4. Neil says:

    Arabia, the question I must ask is how do you know that global warming is true? Just how cold do you need the winter to be before you begin to question things?

  5. Donna K says:

    Then can anyone tell me why Obama is still pushing foward on this??

  6. Phil Kammer Phil Kammer says:

    It’s on the agenda – – now I know what that sounds, but it is that simple.

  7. IsraeliMom says:

    What’s your point about denouncing global warming? Are you suggesting that the human race can go on polluting the air, land and sea and taking down the rain forests for more hamburgers?

    It’s not about whether or not the earth is warming up. It’s about the undeniable damage we’re causing to the earth.

  8. Phil Kammer Phil Kammer says:

    Those are two different issues. Global warming is fast becoming a led weight around the neck of those who supported it. Now pollution is an issue and we as a human race should educate people regarding the reasons to keep our communities safe and clean. I do not believe massive government programs are necessary. I do believe that the EPA needs to do a better job at standards for American business. I have many feelings on it: I hate many plastics. I believe plastics have not been researched enough and may very well be leading to numerous cancers. Global Warming is not tied in any way to this….nor has it ever been. As a matter of fact – because of Global Warming we as humans have actually left behind much of the fight against pollution. If you stop chasing the false science that 30,000 American scientist now say was wrong we can get back to the real work of saving our environment.

  9. Shawn D. says:

    The environmental movement has been hijacked, and now it is being used as a tool for more abusive governments around the world. It is a way to usher in a global tax on the people of the world, and once their is a global tax, you will need a global system to enforce it. The United nations is a cover for one of the most daring operations to set in place a one-world government if I have ever seen one. This may sound like some nut job Alex Jones talk coming from me, but all you have to do is look at what would happen if a global climate treaty was ever agreed to by the larger nations of the world. It is not so far fetched to believe that these people have more than just MONEY on their minds, but power as well.

    If you agree these groups of “environmentalists” would like more power, than my statement above is not so far fetched. If not, and you believe there is climate change and man is causing it because we drive big cars and eat too much meat (or not enough, not too sure where that is at the moment) and we breath too much, then I guess there is no real debate, you are set in your ways.

    The thing is, pollution and climate change are totally two different things, on the opposite ends of the spectrum. Yes, we must keep the earth clean, but the wacky environmentalists want to make a profit along the way. That right there should sound an alarm

  10. Jeff B says:

    I laugh at all this arrogance to think that somehow MAN can “save the planet”.

    Carlin had it right. It’s this arrogance and meddling with nature that’s gets us in trouble. The Earth is FAR bigger than our efforts. Most of these people don’t give a crap about the planet. They are far more concerned about getting control of Government and Industry as a means to supplant Democracy and institute Socialism.

    Al Gore has financial gains/ interests. He should excuse himself from further speculation while he pimps carbon credits and stands to become the worlds first carbon billionaire. Same can be said for the fraudulent information manipulation from the “scientist” given the data to analyze.

    They should face criminal charges if found they falsified this information.

  11. Martin Judd says:

    Arabia Jackson asks “How do we know this (Global Warming) is true?”. Answer: Easy, event head IPCC scientist Phil Jones admits that there has been no statistically significant global warming for the past 15 years and since 2002 has been cooling. This is contrary to IPCC’s prediction of CONTINUED global warming in line with increasing levels of CO2. The Global Warming just isn’t there and it’s a travesty IPCC can’t explain it.

  12. Nancy says:

    Sadly, any government will only do what it’s people want it to do. In 1959, scrubbers were invented that would remove the pollutants from smokestacks. It would have cost a little more for electricity. TOday, in the 6 million acres of the NYS Adirondack State Park, a pregnant woman can’t eat the wild fish taken from the park. Why? Because those scrubbers weren’t put in the smokestacks and there is too much mercury in the water of those 6 million acres.

    If we don’t speak up for the polar bears and the penguins and the wild flowers in Glacier National Park, then climactic global change will continue without us.

    “Global Warming” is not about warming all over the globe, but about climactic change. Warming at the poles means more fresh water in the ocean which means cooling of the temperate oceans.

  13. Phil Kammer Phil Kammer says:

    I appreciate your comment. You may want to do a small search as to what is truly happening to the population of polar bears – they have been thriving for over 50 years with populations growing.

Leave a Reply

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes