Comments on: Global Warming Dying A Horrible Death

By: Phil Kammer

Phil Kammer — Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:14:29 +0000

I appreciate your comment. You may want to do a small search as to what is truly happening to the population of polar bears – they have been thriving for over 50 years with populations growing.

By: Nancy

Nancy — Fri, 02 Apr 2010 16:51:06 +0000

Sadly, any government will only do what it’s people want it to do. In 1959, scrubbers were invented that would remove the pollutants from smokestacks. It would have cost a little more for electricity. TOday, in the 6 million acres of the NYS Adirondack State Park, a pregnant woman can’t eat the wild fish taken from the park. Why? Because those scrubbers weren’t put in the smokestacks and there is too much mercury in the water of those 6 million acres.

If we don’t speak up for the polar bears and the penguins and the wild flowers in Glacier National Park, then climactic global change will continue without us.

“Global Warming” is not about warming all over the globe, but about climactic change. Warming at the poles means more fresh water in the ocean which means cooling of the temperate oceans.

By: Martin Judd

Martin Judd — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:30:06 +0000

Arabia Jackson asks “How do we know this (Global Warming) is true?”. Answer: Easy, event head IPCC scientist Phil Jones admits that there has been no statistically significant global warming for the past 15 years and since 2002 has been cooling. This is contrary to IPCC’s prediction of CONTINUED global warming in line with increasing levels of CO2. The Global Warming just isn’t there and it’s a travesty IPCC can’t explain it.

By: Jeff B

Jeff B — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:01:28 +0000

I laugh at all this arrogance to think that somehow MAN can “save the planet”.

Carlin had it right. It’s this arrogance and meddling with nature that’s gets us in trouble. The Earth is FAR bigger than our efforts. Most of these people don’t give a crap about the planet. They are far more concerned about getting control of Government and Industry as a means to supplant Democracy and institute Socialism.

Al Gore has financial gains/ interests. He should excuse himself from further speculation while he pimps carbon credits and stands to become the worlds first carbon billionaire. Same can be said for the fraudulent information manipulation from the “scientist” given the data to analyze.

They should face criminal charges if found they falsified this information.

By: Shawn D.

Shawn D. — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:50:06 +0000

The environmental movement has been hijacked, and now it is being used as a tool for more abusive governments around the world. It is a way to usher in a global tax on the people of the world, and once their is a global tax, you will need a global system to enforce it. The United nations is a cover for one of the most daring operations to set in place a one-world government if I have ever seen one. This may sound like some nut job Alex Jones talk coming from me, but all you have to do is look at what would happen if a global climate treaty was ever agreed to by the larger nations of the world. It is not so far fetched to believe that these people have more than just MONEY on their minds, but power as well.

If you agree these groups of “environmentalists” would like more power, than my statement above is not so far fetched. If not, and you believe there is climate change and man is causing it because we drive big cars and eat too much meat (or not enough, not too sure where that is at the moment) and we breath too much, then I guess there is no real debate, you are set in your ways.

The thing is, pollution and climate change are totally two different things, on the opposite ends of the spectrum. Yes, we must keep the earth clean, but the wacky environmentalists want to make a profit along the way. That right there should sound an alarm

By: Phil Kammer

Phil Kammer — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:11:25 +0000

Those are two different issues. Global warming is fast becoming a led weight around the neck of those who supported it. Now pollution is an issue and we as a human race should educate people regarding the reasons to keep our communities safe and clean. I do not believe massive government programs are necessary. I do believe that the EPA needs to do a better job at standards for American business. I have many feelings on it: I hate many plastics. I believe plastics have not been researched enough and may very well be leading to numerous cancers. Global Warming is not tied in any way to this….nor has it ever been. As a matter of fact – because of Global Warming we as humans have actually left behind much of the fight against pollution. If you stop chasing the false science that 30,000 American scientist now say was wrong we can get back to the real work of saving our environment.

By: IsraeliMom

IsraeliMom — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 06:34:47 +0000

What’s your point about denouncing global warming? Are you suggesting that the human race can go on polluting the air, land and sea and taking down the rain forests for more hamburgers?

It’s not about whether or not the earth is warming up. It’s about the undeniable damage we’re causing to the earth.

By: Phil Kammer

Phil Kammer — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:32:03 +0000

It’s on the agenda – – now I know what that sounds, but it is that simple.

By: Donna K

Donna K — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:09:19 +0000

Then can anyone tell me why Obama is still pushing foward on this??

By: Neil

Neil — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:24:38 +0000

Arabia, the question I must ask is how do you know that global warming is true? Just how cold do you need the winter to be before you begin to question things?