Sure they have churches and even some Christians who are required to keep their opinions to themselves.  Kind of like animals kept behind a gate in a zoo.  Speak out about any sin and find yourself in prison: you Christian dog.

Islam, radical murdering bastards in your community;  how dare you speak out against them why don’t you know they are loving and kind hearted apart from the man they beheaded last night. 

Oh, poor King Richard I, how his Lionheart must ache for men of God to rise up in his nation: he must surly be planning a cou de tat in his grave.

So many Muslims setting up camp in his nation:  so many communities stolen intentionally to destroy England.  Yet, the English sit and do nothing.  Can the Christian enter Muslim lands surely not with their heads, but England and its foolish Parliament of jesters kindly lets Muslims enter into the kingdom with a smile.

The English Parliament says, but, but we have order and new hate crimes laws that we can force upon the Christians because they don’t fight back: we are sure the Muslims will abide by them too because they said they were honorable when then came to our lands.  Surely the Muslims are honorable: right?

Just the other day I was reading an English website and it spoke of how the police had arrested a Christian street preacher in Workington, Cumbria because he said that Homosexuality was a sin.  Well, actually he was just quoting God, but that didn’t matter.  He had violated the sacred Public Order Act which apparently says that anything that God says is against the law: they thew the poor man in jail.

Now,  this happens quit frequently in merry old England and even Prime Minister Brown will not look into such a travesty, after all the poor Christian minister was likely a bigot.

So, in reading this article I decided to make a comment and register my complaint with the people and the English web site.  I had wrote a wonderful rebuttal to such an offence of freedom that I felt even King Richard would be proud.   Sadly, as I tried to post my comment the website required me to click on their policy button that demanded I surrender all my freedoms as a Christian.

Surly you say not, but yes and to my surprise it said that I could not comment on anything that would offend anyone and not speak badly of homosexuals under penalty of the lash: well maybe a lawsuit.  Interesting, that this English web site is allowed their legal bigotry.  Oh, this wasn’t only one English web site but the majority that have such requirements: England, does surly not like a Christian with a tongue.

Freedom oh freedom, you are under such an attack from those who hate the truth.  When a gay man calls you a homophobe it is because he wants to murder you, but he can’t, so he will instead frighten you with a word.  A fear that yearly leads many employers to fire or layoff many Christians.  A fear that is so powerful in England that street preachers are placed in jail for uttering Gods word.

In the same manor do the Muslims use the word Islamophobe to spread fear in the hearts of the English and the Crown.  Fortunately, in the United States these two words are fast becoming words of honor.  I am proud to be a homophobe and an Islamophobe for it means that I am a watchmen on the wall protecting children and families in the free world.  So, I encourage everyone who reads this article to no longer be frightened of local ordinances or laws that limit speech, but instead vote out those who support such bigotry such as Priminister Brown.

Take to the streets in mass and speak as your fathers spoke and if necessary bring your sword: The Lionheart would be proud of you, but possibly not his kin.

After Reagan’s famous speech to Gorbachev calling for the tearing down of the Berlin wall, it seemed that our adversary would end up a great new ally of world peace and harmony.  The relationship between Reagan and Gorbachev let one to believe that our nations would end up very close.

However, as it seems, the United States may have squandered this opportunity by redefining Gorbachev’s decision to release Russia’s iron grip on the east.   Weather Gorbacheve’s decision to tear down the wall was because of their loosing the arms race; being fearful of Reagan’s new space toys, or even just a measure of solidarity for peace, the United States, after Reagan left office, began to hail it as a Cold War victory.

This, I can only imagine immediately became a lingering thorn in the side of every proud communist in Russia; every aging KGB agent and certainly never forgetting the American Communist Party of which our President has been so enamored with.  Gorbachev must have felt like an idiot, especially after Reagan left office and this idea of a cold war loss took shape.

As time moved pass the tearing down of the wall and other eastern state collapses, the concept inside America that we had won the cold war was being herald: sadly and primarily by my party the Republicans.  We used it, as a war prize, and flaunted it in front of the Democrats.  However, even they used it when it was advantageous.

Now look, I am not saying that Reagan didn’t do a great job: he did.  I am saying that I wonder if Reagan would have rubbed it in, leaving the Russian people feeling, as if, they had been defeated militarily.  No, I don’t think he would have.  I believe he wanted the wall down for freedoms sake and to hell with who won the cold war. Reagan was a man of principle and simple truths.  Now, I don’t have all of Reagan’s writings in front of me, so he may have brought up a cold war victory with Russia and if so please let me know.

I personally believe that a good deal of the communist nationalism we see emerging today is directly driven by the shame of being reminded repeatedly by the west that they lost the cold war.

Sadly, I believe the United States lost the opportunity to develop a greater relationship with Russia when it decided to continually bring up a Soviet cold war loss.

This lack of good  judgement on the part of the those in power within the United States could have, yes possibly, just pissed off some unemployed hard line communist old KGB farts who might have had nothing to do but to design and partner with American sympathizers a way to bring America to her knees: Fannie Mae and Freddi Mac.

This certainly makes one think about how powerful the old Soviet Union may still be.

Having old and cranky KGB  agents around who’s loyalty to Stalin is unwavering even makes the death of the Polish President look suspicious.

Now, I am not saying Putin would be involved in any KGB retribution, as he seems to be truly trying to change his nation for the better, but under his watch, just possibly, world destruction may have possibly been designed.

Could it be, that very soon, under our Pentagons watch and an interesting Presidential Administration that the tables of victory might be secretly turned on its head: might the cold war never have ended until today?

Interesting thought huh?

This information rocked the scientific community this week, although the American press never mentioned a word about it:

Scientist at the heart of the ‘Climategate’ email scandal broke the law when they refused to give raw data to the public, the privacy watchdog has ruled.

The Information Commissioner’s office said University of East Anglia researchers breached the Freedom of Information Act when handling requests from climate change sceptics.

But the scientists will escape prosecution because the offences took place more than six months ago.

Amid all the hoop-la concerning this continually-unfolding scandal is one central truth–if a scientist’s hypothesis can be verified by the hard data using the ‘scientific method,’ there is no need whatsoever for hiding information from the public and from other scientists, much less manipulating data to prove one’s point.

The very fact that these things were done serves to immediately and irrefutably nullify the notion that climate change is ‘man-made.’

But in this case the scientists involved broke the law.  However, as the article cited above points out, they will not face prosecution due to a hoophole in that law.  How convenient.  Crimes of this magnitude should be prosecuted vigorously and the perpetrators, if found guilty, should do serious jail time.

This is not the only bombshell news involving Climategate, however.

The Times of the U.K. published explosive information just yesterday showing that before the U.N.’s Copenhagen summit on climate change in December, the organization’s climate chief Rajendra Pachauri was informed that the widely-distributed claim that the Himalayan glaciers would melt by 2035 was false.

Pachauri, however, proceeded with business as usual during the summit and took a full 2 months to acknowledge the glaring error:

Rajendra Pachauri was told that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessment that the glaciers would disappear by 2035 was wrong, but he waited two months to correct it. He failed to act despite learning that the claim had been refuted by several leading glaciologists.

The IPCC’s report underpinned the proposals at Copenhagen for drastic cuts in global emissions.

Dr Pachauri, who played a leading role at the summit, corrected the error last week after coming under media pressure. He told The Times on January 22 that he had only known about the error for a few days. He said: “I became aware of this when it was reported in the media about ten days ago. Before that, it was really not made known. Nobody brought it to my attention. There were statements, but we never looked at this 2035 number.”

Asked whether he had deliberately kept silent about the error to avoid embarrassment at Copenhagen, he said: “That’s ridiculous. It never came to my attention before the Copenhagen summit. It wasn’t in the public sphere.”

In addition, a science journalist, Pallava Bagla, had asked Pachauri about the error last November, to which Pachauri replied, ‘I don’t have anything to add on glaciers.’

Perhaps someone should inform the good doctor that the issue is not whether or not he has anything to add.  He has ‘added’ quite enough.  The issue at hand is whether or not he will delete grossly erroneous information–false data that has cost governments billions.

The individuals who have engaged in this scandal of historic proportions–perpetrating a hoax on the entire world that has polluted minds and resulted in needless concern and panic–are criminals who should be tried in a court of law and sent to jail.  The United Nations is quick to condemn individuals and nations who veer from its pie-in-the-sky prescriptions for humankind.  Where is the outrage over Climategate?  Why are there no calls for criminal investigations although these scientists broke the law?

The answer should be clear.  As long as one lies on behalf of the ‘approved agenda’ no harm is done.

Although, he was possibly the first to really push it on a population.

His argument was orchestrated to place the mantle of guilt squarely, on the Banking industry, proclaiming to the public that he was:

“to recover every single dime the American people are owed.”

This might seem very noble, but the truth of the matter is, that those targeted banks have either previously paid, or are rapidly already paying those funds.

Therefore, Obama’s statement had little to do with repaying any of America’s borrowed stimulus cash.

The truth was, as it seems, a trial and error scenario designed to test the will of the American populace.

If President Obama could successfully implement this deceptive income tax on the American population via the banking establishment,  it would generate billions in revenue and a world banking tax would be possible.

Last year Great Briton’s Gordon Brown proposed a national banking  tax called the Tobin Tax. Gordon had hope that it would be accepted easily.

It seems likely, that this idea was embraced by Obama and likely became the basis for his current effort.

Now just a month after Obama floated his proposal,  Gordon Brown wants all World Banks to be required to pay a new tax.

What authority does the European community have to Levey a tax on American citizens?

The last taxes from England come from the Sugar Act and the Stamp Act, both ended up in bloodshed and I am sure England doesn’t want to go through that again.

Yet,  if they, the European Union and the United Nations  persist,  Americans will have little choice but to spread Tea Parties throughout Europe.

A taxing global body is exactly what Hitler, Genghis Khan, Julius Cesar, Napoleon, and Muhammad would have all wanted.

Any global tax, in any way is an attack on the freedom of man, nationalism and patriotism.

To make matters worse, as if we didn’t have enough hyper socialist economics in the United States, many European nations are instead of cutting taxes and allowing the free market to set economies right have decided that spending is again the best way to solve this problem.

At one point European nations cellebrated Germany for not following the stimulus path as the United States did, but somehow they have forgotten that a nation does not need to go into debt in order to successfully manage the economic crisis.

Do I even dare speak of cutting national budgets any longer?

Will a common sense approach to balanced budgets ever gain traction as it should?

Will  socialist ideologies drag the word into another middle ages or will right thinking conservatives around the world take the lead and address the situation.

As it seems, there is no time for debate.

Those who are pushing these socialist economic policies of government growth and spending are also the same ones endeavoring to remove personal freedoms.

Who will stand up for freedom and name Socialism and its elitists prophets for who they are?

It is time to do away with this form of government and its personal imprisonment that forces  government intrusion into the  lives of all good men and women.  Granted there are aspects of socialism that may be beneficial, but as a system of government it often moves to restrict freedoms much to easily.

There isn’t a day that passes where either the EU or individual nations are not attempting to remove individual freedoms; monitor personal movement or communications.

This must be stopped and personal freedoms returned.

It is important that supporters of capitalism and socialism who are reasonable men or women not become polarize to one another, but rather seek a common truth that personal freedom within each form of government is essential.

Those who are found within each form of government selling the idea that personal freedom can only come with more government control need to be identified and removed from their seat of power.

If this does not occur soon the world will inevitably be caught up in civil and or world war.

Eh, maybe, maybe not. Perhaps we’re not looking at this story objectively. In fact, there is too much emotion involved in how people are reacting to the possibility that this international law enforcement organization could become a centralized police power. Unless there is such a drastic plan in place, it just isn’t feasible but some things are always worthy of investigation. INTERPOL’s purpose is to serve as a hub for information sharing, intelligence, training of law enforcement agencies worldwide. It’s no different than cops back home; when a call takes them to another jurisdiction they call ahead and ask the guys at the other end to be on the alert. INTERPOL is pretty much like that; it helps agencies track statistical data as well, assists in the search for fugitives and their apprehension. INTERPOL in that context is not a bad thing. The fact is that amending EO-12425 is not as significant in itself because there are some other elements missing at this time.

Let us look at INTERPOL from a different perspective on the role of this international agency. One of the agency’s accomplishments in 2009 was the successful introduction of the INTERPOL passport, which was perfected and is being introduced into use. This passport is designed to function just like any other passport however it has been enhanced to afford expediency for teams or individuals who are invited to any of the member countries, all 188 of them, to pass through customs and passport control without interference. I suppose these individuals must be thoroughly vetted before being given such easy access into a country. The US sends plenty of FBI people overseas to assist in counterterrorism investigations all the time but I am sure that these teams can get expedited passage with their credentials. Still, law enforcement travel is tricky so countries track these individuals. Does such a passport mean fast entry but how about monitoring movement in country? Maybe there is something in the language of INTERPOL’s Secretary General that got me thinking:

“When member countries ask INTERPOL for assistance to prevent, investigate, or respond to any terrorist act, serious crime or natural disaster, the safety and security of their citizens may depend on INTERPOL being in place as fast as possible,” said Secretary General Noble.

“That a person is travelling with an INTERPOL passport for official business should be all the information a country needs in order to grant them access. By agreeing to waive visas for INTERPOL passport holders, member countries will ultimately be assisting themselves,” added Mr Noble.

INTERPOL is entering the much needed aspect of police peacekeeping and peace-building operations. You’ve probably heard the term peacekeeping more in relation to police actions such as the intervention in the Balkans of the 1990s. I am saying ‘much-needed’ for a legitimate reason. The importance of an international police force that will help military elements establish and maintain the rule of law in occupied countries has been debated and suggested for many years. The invasion of Iraq in 2003 at first appeared to be beneficial and it was expected that the population would be cooperative. The intention is always to establish the rule of law as soon as combat operations are stable or stop in order to assist the local people re-enter a period of rehabilitation. War is stressful and disrupts the normal lives of people; that’s a given.

Stability operations in Iraq went awry five weeks after Coalition troops invaded. Forget the search for Saddam Hussein; in the absence of a stable environment, Iraqis were left with the euphoric feeling of freedom without the benefit of a well-established law enforcement presence. It is also the stuff the U.S. is attempting to do in Iraq and Afghanistan; to rebuild their countries from the bottom up. The International Criminal Court – which seeks jurisdiction in the U.S. as it has in other countries – would be more involved in American law and order at all but then it needs an enforcement branch in order to be effective. At any rate, something is missing in the equation.

The ICC goes hand in hand with the UN (under war crimes tribunal, not for the persecution – prosecution of individual parties but of countries) and INTERPOL is wrapped nicely inside that circle. The question is how realistic is the possibility of these forces deploying to the U.S. To have a foreign police force deploy to the U.S. it must be due to an invitation by that country or international police authority for them to come. What is different here is the absence of a crisis big enough to warrant such an invitation. Scattered incidents involving violence or civil disorder may give the perception that we are in such trouble that we must outsource our security from others but this poses an even more troubling question.  If such a police force is vetted to have passports that allow them to enter any member country easily, does the U.S. have any input or access on their background? Are we sure those cops are really who they say they are?

Just wondering.

The question that remains, is who put these scientist up to this heist and who worked so frantically  to extort the worlds wealthiest nations: who has yet to be revealed?

Who falsified documents; who will try and deny their roll in frightening the world into potentially paying billions in global warming taxes.

Obviously, Al Gore needs to be fully investigated for his frighten theatrics and lying to the worlds population for personal gain.

With over 30,000 American Scientist demanding additional evidence into global warming no excuse will be sufficient.

Currently the calls for  Rajendra Pachauri to resign as Chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPPC) are heating up because of his shabby scientific reporting of  global warming science.  A false science  used to beat down the truth and frighten billions of humans into submission.

Any investigations into the falsehoods of global warming need not be only investigated by one nation or the UN, but rather a joint commission with punishments ready to be handed out.

Vaclav Klaus, the President of the Czech Republic would be an excellent choice to head such a massive endeavor.  President Klaus was one of the few world leaders who demanded better evidence into global warming and was met  by ridicule and insults by UN scientists and other pro global warming promoters.

Many of the worlds monarchies need to be unapologetically investigated, as well, for their roll.  The President of the United States Barack Obama and his Administration along with other European leaders need to be considered as well as they pushed this false agenda onto the people.

The people of the world need honest representation when it comes to global warming.  Those who promoted global warming upon the world need not apply to any investigating body.

The truth needs to be uncovered and those who are guilty punished.

The American people must fight any forced inclusion into a European or North American Union of States. The United States must remain a sovereign and strong voice to the world just in case another Hitler arises: this reason is enough to say no.

If Obama signs this Climate Change legally binding treaty it will strap the American people to the whims of a bunch of power hungry Europeanism and the United States economy will take a nose dive. If signed, America will be expected to reduce emissions translating into less production and less wealth building capacity for this nation.

My suggestion is that States must start getting serious about taking care of their own people even if it angers the Obama Administration.

Many might ask, this can’t happen because our militaries would intervene. Why would they intervene, there are no battles, no enemy combatants? Our American military has no means to defend against such an attack. In the United States the President or Congress must act first. Unfortunately, if they have been compromised and intentionally placed just for this bloodless world coup no military action will occur. Even if some of the generals within the Pentagon began to wonder what was going on it would be difficult to search out those to trust.

The truth here is very simple: one must just open his eyes. The economic crisis was man made as was the climate catastrophe. It is also possible that many of the weather catastrophes were also created by man. The push is to take the world without a drop of blood. This act is not an act of protection or preservation of our world as we know it, but a psychological bombardment significant enough to shake the economies and peoples of this world. The ultimate goal is to primarily destroy the United States economy and its individual freedoms. America will never be able to interfere with world dominance again if this occurs. A one world order will force a situation by which no man has any individual freedoms but as the state gives him. There are no longer any new worlds to flee to. The things to come are easily seen in current European law, Children have the same rights as the parents (It is illegal to spank); homeschooling is outlawed (punishment of imprisonment), God and his laws are removed from society, positive homosexuality is forced upon your children, all schools private and public must teach state required lessons. These are not my opinions, but currently occurring situations. Many of you already have read or heard about much of them. Our world is about to be lost: with no where else to go.